In this article we report on a regional study in the Pacific Northwest concerning the attitudes of scientists, resource managers, representatives of interest groups, and members of the involved public regarding preferred roles for research and field ecologists in natural resource management. Specifically, we examine the question of whether scientists should act as policy advocates and, if so, in what way. We also examine the factors that are perceived to affect scientists' credibility in these roles.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2003
Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study
DENISE LACH,
PETER LIST,
BRENT STEEL,
BRUCE SHINDLER
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
BioScience
Vol. 53 • No. 2
February 2003
Vol. 53 • No. 2
February 2003
advocacy
credibility
LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) Network
policy